Insights

Your CRE Deal Has Two Readers: The Investor and the Adviser They Forward It To

A commercial real estate presentation may reach someone who never heard your pitch. Here is how to explain the opportunity, the assumptions and the risks when it does.

By Angelica Sirotin

Investor Communications

6 min read

Placeholder cover

Imagine an investor leaving a promising conversation with a commercial real estate sponsor. They forward the deck to their adviser with a short note: “What do you think?”

The adviser has the attachment, but missed the explanation of why the sponsor chose this property, the caveat about refinancing and the answer to the question about distributions.

That gives anyone writing CRE investor materials a useful question to ask: can the next person understand the deal and examine its assumptions without reconstructing the meeting?

Some high-net-worth investors conduct their own detailed analysis. Others involve a wealth adviser, accountant, attorney or family office team. In either case, the presentation should make sense without the sponsor there to explain it.

What should a CRE investor presentation explain first?

Start with the property, the business plan, the proposed investment structure and what must happen for the plan to work. Explain the main risks alongside the opportunity, while the reader is deciding whether to look more closely.

“Value-add industrial opportunity” gives someone a category. It leaves them to discover what the sponsor intends to change. Is the plan to lease vacant space, renew below-market leases, complete a redevelopment or improve operations? Those are different propositions.

The first few pages should let an investor explain the deal in their own words: what they would own, how the property is expected to generate cash, what work remains and why this team is equipped to do it.

Ask about the investor’s priorities rather than assuming them from their wealth. Someone seeking distributions during the holding period has different questions from someone comfortable waiting for a sale. The materials should help each work out whether the proposed investment fits those priorities.

What changes when an adviser reads the deck?

An adviser may begin by checking the assumptions behind the summary. Make them easy to find, with dates, sources and links to the documents that support them.

Consider a hypothetical multi-tenant industrial acquisition:

Hypothetical · multi-tenant industrial
  • 70% leased by area at acquisition

  • Base case: 90% leased by month 24

  • Refinancing assumed at month 24

  • Acquisition loan matures in month 36

These figures are illustrative, with no connection to a client or actual investment.

A summary describing “income and refinance-driven liquidity” leaves too much unexplained. Spell out that the plan depends on leasing vacant space and obtaining new financing. If investors are projected to receive capital back from refinancing, explain what needs to happen for that payment to be possible.

An adviser can then ask more specific questions:

Questions the adviser will ask
  • What supports the leasing timetable and assumed rents? Identify executed leases, relevant comparables and negotiations separately.

  • What happens if leasing takes another year? Explain the effect on operating cash flow, reserves and the approaching debt maturity.

  • What would lenders need to see at refinancing? Show the financing assumptions and what happens if the loan proceeds are lower than projected.

  • If refinancing does not happen, what alternatives could the sponsor pursue, and what would each mean for investors?

The sponsor supplies the underwriting and scenario analysis. Our job is to explain how those assumptions affect the proposed investment and what happens if they prove wrong. A slide showing strong market demand still needs to explain why this property is expected to lease on this timetable.

If a projected distribution depends on refinancing, say so on the slide showing that distribution. The reader should be able to see the amount and the condition together.

How should fees, liquidity and track record be presented?

Spell out how returns are calculated, what the holding period means and which investments appear in the track record. These details help readers understand what the figures actually tell them.

For a private CRE offering, we would want the materials to answer four groups of questions:

Four groups of questions
  • Fees and distributions. Who receives acquisition, management, financing or disposition fees, where applicable? How does the distribution waterfall allocate cash? Are projected investor returns shown after the relevant fees and sponsor participation?

  • Liquidity. Is the stated holding period a plan or a contractual right? What restrictions apply to transfers or redemptions? Who can extend the investment, and on what terms?

  • Track record. Which investments are included, over what dates and with what strategy? Distinguish realized outcomes from current valuations, gross from net returns, and the current firm’s work from experience team members gained elsewhere.

  • Downside. What could reduce distributions, require additional capital or cause a loss? Explain the sponsor’s proposed responses and their limits.

The SEC’s private-placement guidance warns that investors may have difficulty reselling their securities and may need to hold them indefinitely. If the sponsor plans to sell in five years, explain what could delay that sale and whether investors have any other way to exit.

For U.S. offerings, “high-net-worth” describes an audience, while accredited investor status has specific eligibility criteria. Have securities counsel approve the materials and how they will be shared, including who may receive or forward them. The second reader discussed here is an authorized recipient.

Will the same explanation survive the website and follow-up email?

Read the deck alongside the financial model, offering documents and the copy used elsewhere. An email can be much shorter than a presentation, but it still needs to describe the same investment accurately.

In our hypothetical example, an email promising “capital back in two years” would misrepresent a model that assumes a refinancing in month 24. A website describing the investment as “stabilized income” would also need to be revised if substantial lease-up is still required.

Keep a dated record of the main claims, the documents supporting them and who has checked them. When the financing terms change, you can see which slides, summaries and emails need updating.

Before sending, ask someone authorized to review the materials, but unfamiliar with the deal, to explain the business plan back to you. If they have to guess, find out what was missing and revise the explanation.

How we approach CRE investor communications

At Sirotin Ventures, our work has included commercial real estate, hedge funds, renewables and aircraft financing. We begin by understanding how the investment works and what a prospective investor needs to know before considering it.

We read the sponsor’s source materials and work through the questions prospective investors have raised. Then we compare the model with the explanation given in conversation and the words that reach an investor afterward. If an assumption is unclear, we ask the client to explain it before putting it into the materials.

Our AI-augmented strategic communications process uses custom tools to organize research, compare sources and help with writing and design. We check the evidence behind the claims and decide how to explain the investment, with our founder leading each engagement and reviewing the work before it reaches the client. We carry that approach through to decks, website copy, emails, case studies and LinkedIn content, writing each for the people who will read it and the questions it needs to answer.

The next time you review a deal presentation, picture it arriving with that short forwarded note. What would the recipient need to know before they could give a useful answer? Start with those questions when you revise the materials.

If you are preparing CRE investor materials and want help making the investment case easier to follow, write to angelica@sirotinventures.com.

Angelica Sirotin

Written by

Angelica Sirotin

CEO, Sirotin Ventures